OUTCOMES OF DEMOCRACY - Q&A
Exercises
1. How does democracy produce an accountable, responsive and legitimate government?
Democracy produces an accountable, responsive, and legitimate government through several key mechanisms:
-
[cite_start]
- Accountability: Democracy ensures that citizens have the right to choose their rulers and maintain control over them[cite: 63]. [cite_start]It establishes a system where decision-making is based on specific norms and procedures[cite: 81]. [cite_start]If a citizen wants to know if a decision was made correctly, they have the right and the means to examine the process, a feature known as transparency[cite: 82, 83, 84]. [cite_start]
- Responsiveness: A basic expected outcome of democracy is a government that is attentive to the needs and expectations of its citizens[cite: 65]. [cite_start]While the record shows that democracies often frustrate these needs, the democratic process provides a platform for citizens to hold the government accountable and participate in decision-making whenever they see fit[cite: 85, 113]. [cite_start]
- Legitimacy: A democratic government is a "people’s own government"[cite: 123]. [cite_start]Even if it is slow or less efficient than a dictatorship, it is legitimate because it is elected by the people themselves[cite: 122, 123]. [cite_start]This is why there is overwhelming global support for the idea of democracy[cite: 124].
2. What are the conditions under which democracies accommodate social diversities?
Democracies must fulfill two specific conditions to successfully accommodate social differences:
-
[cite_start]
- Majority-Minority Collaboration: Democracy is not simply rule by majority opinion[cite: 288]. [cite_start]The majority must always work with the minority to ensure the government represents a general view rather than just a segment of society[cite: 289]. [cite_start]
- Inclusive Majority Rule: Rule by majority must not become rule by a specific community based on religion, race, or linguistic groups[cite: 291]. [cite_start]Democracy remains inclusive only as long as every citizen has a chance of being part of the majority at some point in time[cite: 298]. [cite_start]If someone is barred from the majority based on birth, the system ceases to be accommodative for them[cite: 299].
3. Give arguments to support or oppose the following assertions:
• Industrialised countries can afford democracy but the poor need dictatorship to become rich.
[cite_start]Oppose: Economic development depends on many factors, including population size, global situation, and economic priorities, rather than just the form of government[cite: 187, 188]. [cite_start]Evidence shows that the difference in growth rates between poor countries under dictatorship (4.34%) and those under democracy (4.28%) is negligible[cite: 238]. [cite_start]Therefore, the benefits of democracy, like dignity and freedom, outweigh the tiny growth difference[cite: 191].
• Democracy can't reduce inequality of incomes between different citizens.
[cite_start]Support (with caveats): In practice, democracies have not been very successful in reducing economic inequalities[cite: 254]. [cite_start]While individuals have political equality (one vote), a small number of ultra-rich continue to enjoy a disproportionate share of wealth while those at the bottom struggle to meet basic needs[cite: 248, 250, 253]. [cite_start]However, democracy provides the legal and moral framework for the poor to struggle against this inequality[cite: 330, 340].
• Government in poor countries should spend less on poverty reduction, health, education and spend more on industries and infrastructure.
Oppose: Spending on health and education (human capital) is essential for long-term growth. [cite_start]As seen in the text, many people in poor countries find it difficult to meet basic needs like schooling and healthcare[cite: 253]. Without these basics, a population cannot effectively participate in or benefit from industrial or infrastructural growth.
• In democracy all citizens have one vote, which means that there is absence of any domination and conflict.
[cite_start]Oppose: While "one person, one vote" provides political equality, it does not automatically remove social or economic domination[cite: 248, 249]. [cite_start]Conflicts still arise because people feel they are not treated with respect[cite: 309]. [cite_start]However, democracy is superior because it provides a peaceful method to resolve these conflicts and respect differences[cite: 34, 286].
4. Identify the challenges to democracy in the following descriptions. Also suggest policy/institutional mechanism to deepen democracy in the given situations:
• Following a High Court directive, a temple in Orissa that had separate entry doors for dalits and non-dalits allowed entry for all from the same door.
[cite_start]Challenge: Caste-based discrimination and inequality[cite: 339].
[cite_start]Mechanism: Strengthening the legal and moral foundations against caste-based atrocities and ensuring strict judicial enforcement of equal rights to all citizens[cite: 340].
• A large number of farmers are committing suicide in different states of India.
[cite_start]Challenge: Economic distress and failure of government responsiveness to the needs of the poor[cite: 111, 252].
[cite_start]Mechanism: Establishing mechanisms for citizens to hold the government accountable and implementing economic priorities that support those at the bottom of the society[cite: 85, 187].
• Following an allegation of killing of three civilians in Gandwara in a fake encounter by Jammu and Kashmir police, an enquiry has been ordered.
[cite_start]Challenge: Violation of individual freedom and dignity by those in power[cite: 308, 336].
[cite_start]Mechanism: Enhancing transparency and the right to examine decision-making processes, ensuring that even "the high and the mighty" are subject to the rule of law[cite: 83, 336].
5. In the context of democracies, which of the following ideas is correct- democracies have successfully eliminated:
A. conflicts among people
B. economic inequalities among people
C. differences of opinion about how marginalised sections are to be treated
D. the idea of political inequality
[cite_start]Answer: D. the idea of political inequality [cite: 248, 389]
[cite_start]Explanation: Democracy is built on the principle of political equality (one vote for one person), even if social and economic inequalities still exist[cite: 248, 249].
6. In the context of assessing democracy, which among the following is the odd one out. Democracies need to ensure:
A. free and fair elections
B. dignity of the individual
C. majority rule
D. equal treatment before law
[cite_start]Answer: C. majority rule [cite: 394]
[cite_start]Explanation: The "odd one out" is "majority rule" because democracy is not simply rule by majority opinion; it must also include the minority and protect individual dignity[cite: 288, 289].
7. Studies on political and social inequalities in democracy show that:
A. democracy and development go together.
B. inequalities exist in democracies.
C. inequalities do not exist under dictatorship.
D. dictatorship is better than democracy.
[cite_start]Answer: B. inequalities exist in democracies. [cite: 398]
[cite_start]Explanation: Evidence shows that despite political equality, growing economic inequalities are found parallel to the democratic process[cite: 249].
8. Read the passage below [about Nannu and the RTI application]:
...What does Nannu's example show? What impact did Nannu's action have on officials?
[cite_start]Answer: Nannu's example illustrates the power of Transparency and the Right to Information (RTI)[cite: 83]. [cite_start]It shows that when a citizen has the means to examine the process of government decision-making, it makes the government accountable and responsive[cite: 65, 83].
[cite_start]Impact: The officials, who previously ignored Nannu, were forced to act quickly once the RTI application was filed[cite: 410, 412]. [cite_start]It transformed their behavior from inaction to efficiency and courtesy because the legal mechanism held them accountable[cite: 413, 414].