WORKING OF INSTITUTIONS - Q&A
1. If you are elected as the President of India which of the following decision can you take on your own?(a) Select the person you like as Prime Minister.
(b) Dismiss a Prime Minister who has a majority in Lok Sabha.
(c) Ask for reconsideration of a bill passed by both the Houses.
(d) Nominate the leaders of your choice to the Council of Ministers.
Answer: (c) Ask for reconsideration of a bill passed by both the Houses.
Explanation:
The President of India generally acts on the advice of the Council of Ministers. However, they have the discretionary power to send a bill back to the Parliament for reconsideration if they feel it requires changes. The other options are incorrect because the PM must command a majority in the Lok Sabha, and the President cannot simply choose anyone they "like" or dismiss a majority-backed PM.
2. Who among the following is a part of the political executive?
(a) District Collector
(b) Secretary of the Ministry of Home Affairs
(c) Home Minister
(d) Director General of Police
Answer: (c) Home Minister
Explanation:
The "Political Executive" comprises elected representatives (like Ministers) who serve for a specific term and remain in power as long as they have the people's mandate. Civil servants like the District Collector or secretaries are part of the "Permanent Executive" because they remain in office even when the ruling party changes.
3. Which of the following statements about the judiciary is false?
(a) Every law passed by the Parliament needs approval of the Supreme Court
(b) Judiciary can strike down a law if it goes against the spirit of the Constitution
(c) Judiciary is independent of the Executive
(d) Any citizen can approach the courts if her rights are violated
Answer: (a) Every law passed by the Parliament needs approval of the Supreme Court
Explanation:
This statement is false. In India, Parliament is the supreme law-making body, and it does not need prior approval from the Supreme Court to pass laws. The Supreme Court's role comes later; it can review a law only if that law is challenged in court and found to violate the Constitution (Judicial Review).
4. Which of the following institutions can make changes to an existing law of the country?
(a) The Supreme Court
(b) The President
(c) The Prime Minister
(d) The Parliament
Answer: (d) The Parliament
Explanation:
The Parliament is the supreme legislative body in India. Only the Parliament has the constitutional authority to amend (change), repeal (remove), or enact (make) laws. The Supreme Court interprets laws, and the Executive implements them.
5. Match the ministry with the news that the ministry may have released:
| (a) A new policy is being made to increase the jute exports from the country. | i. Ministry of Defence |
| (b) Telephone services will be made more accessible to rural areas. | ii. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Public Distribution |
| (c) The price of rice and wheat sold under the Public Distribution System will go down. | iii. Ministry of Health |
| (d) A pulse polio campaign will be launched. | iv. Ministry of Commerce and Industry |
| (e) The allowances of the soldiers posted on high altitudes will be increased. | v. Ministry of Communications and Information Technology |
Answer:
(a) — iv. Ministry of Commerce and Industry
(b) — v. Ministry of Communications and Information Technology
(c) — ii. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Public Distribution
(d) — iii. Ministry of Health
(e) — i. Ministry of Defence
Explanation:
Each ministry handles a specific portfolio:
- Exports are trade-related (Commerce).
- Telephones/Internet fall under Communications.
- Ration (PDS) is food distribution (Agriculture/Food).
- Polio campaigns are health initiatives (Health).
- Soldiers are part of the armed forces (Defence).
6. Of all the institutions that we have studied in this chapter, name the one that exercises the powers on each of the following matters.
(a) Decision on allocation of money for developing infrastructure like roads, irrigation etc. and different welfare activities for the citizens.
(b) Considers the recommendation of a Committee on a law to regulate the stock exchange.
(c) Decides on a legal dispute between two state governments.
(d) Implements the decision to provide relief for the victims of an earthquake.
Answer:
(a) The Lok Sabha (Ministry of Finance)
(b) The Parliament
(c) The Supreme Court
(d) The Executive
Explanation:
(a) The budget (money allocation) must be passed by the Lok Sabha.
(b) Making laws to regulate sectors like the stock market is a legislative function of the Parliament.
(c) Disputes between federal units (States) are under the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
(d) Actual groundwork and implementation of relief is the job of the Executive (civil servants and ministers).
7. Why is the Prime Minister in India not directly elected by the people? Choose the most appropriate answer and give reasons for your choice.
(a) In a Parliamentary democracy only the leader of the majority party in the Lok Sabha can become the Prime Minister.
(b) Lok Sabha can remove the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers even before the expiry of their term.
(c) Since the Prime Minister is appointed by the President there is no need for it.
(d) Direct election of the Prime Minister will involve lot of expenditure on election.
Answer: (a) In a Parliamentary democracy only the leader of the majority party in the Lok Sabha can become the Prime Minister.
Explanation:
This is the most appropriate reason because India follows the Parliamentary system of government (modeled on the UK system). In this system, the executive (PM) is part of the legislature and must command the support of the majority of MPs to function. If the PM were directly elected by the people but his party lost the Lok Sabha elections, there would be a conflict between the PM and the Parliament, leading to instability (also known as legislative deadlock).
8. Three friends went to watch a film that showed the hero becoming Chief Minister for a day and making big changes in the state. Imran said this is what the country needs. Rizwan said this kind of a personal rule without institutions is dangerous. Shankar said all this is a fantasy. No minister can do anything in one day. What would be your reaction to such a film?
Answer: I would agree with Rizwan’s perspective.
Explanation:
While the idea of a "hero" fixing everything quickly is exciting (like in a movie), Rizwan is correct that "personal rule without institutions is dangerous."
1. Dictatorship risk: Democracy relies on checks and balances. If one person has all the power, they can become a dictator.
2. Sustainability: Changes made in a rush often fail. Proper procedures, discussions, and institutional support are needed for long-term progress.
3. Democratic Process: Bypassing institutions destroys the very foundation of democracy, which is rule by law, not by one person's whim.
9. A teacher was making preparations for a mock parliament. She called two students to act as leaders of two political parties. She gave them an option: Each one could choose to have a majority either in the mock Lok Sabha or in the mock Rajya Sabha. If this choice was given to you, which one would you choose and why?
Answer: I would choose to have a majority in the mock Lok Sabha.
Explanation:
The Lok Sabha is politically more powerful than the Rajya Sabha for three key reasons:
1. Money Bills: The Rajya Sabha cannot reject the budget or money bills; only the Lok Sabha can.
2. Forming Government: The Prime Minister and Council of Ministers are responsible to the Lok Sabha. If the Lok Sabha passes a "No Confidence Motion," the government falls. The Rajya Sabha does not have this power.
3. Joint Sessions: In a joint session to resolve a deadlock, the Lok Sabha usually wins because it has more than double the number of members (543) compared to the Rajya Sabha (245).
10. After reading the example of the reservation order, three students had different reactions about the role of the judiciary. Which view, according to you, is a correct reading of the role of judiciary?
(a) Srinivas argues that since the Supreme Court agreed with the government, it is not independent.
(b) Anjaiah says that judiciary is independent because it could have given a verdict against the government order. The Supreme Court did direct the government to modify it.
(c) Vijaya thinks that the judiciary is neither independent nor conformist, but acts as a mediator between opposing parties. The court struck a good balance between those who supported and those who opposed the order.
Answer: (b) Anjaiah's view is the correct reading.
Explanation:
Anjaiah correctly identifies that independence means the ability to judge without pressure. The Supreme Court reviewed the government's order and did not just blindly accept it. It ordered a modification (excluding the "creamy layer" from reservations), which shows it has the power to correct the government. This proves the judiciary is independent and acts as a guardian of the Constitution.